A smart grid is a transactive grid.
- Lynne Kiesling
Looming Battle in Smart Grid: Software vs. Services

Via GreenTech Media’s Green Light blog, an interesting article on the looming battle between companies which make hardware & software for controlling power and the demand response service providers.  As the article notes:

“…A fight over control of the home (and office) seems to be taking shape.

As time goes on, the world will likely see competition between companies like Tendril and Adura Technologies that make hardware and software for controlling power in buildings, and demand response service providers like Comverge and EnerNoc, which have independent networks that deliver “negawatts” of power to utilities in terms of reduced consumption.

The nub of the competition is that these companies provide technologies that can accomplish the same task. The hardware/software vendors effectively install equipment that lets utilities, with the cooperation of the residents, curb power to lights and appliances. Businesses and consumers can deploy these technologies themselves without a utility, but because of the subsidies and benefits utilities can offer, they will be invariably involved.

Without a middleman, the costs for adding this sort of functionality will be lower.

“We don’t think the utilities should be throwing the problem over the fence and outsourcing it,” asserts Adrian Tuck, CEO of Tendril. “We don’t see negawatts succeeding in the long-term.

“We will provide the utilities with the tools to do it themselves,” he said.

Demand response providers tend to strongly disagree. One of the best pieces of evidence: demand response is growing. EnerNoc has more than 2.7 gigawatts under management. Having a demand response provider also gives a utility someone to point the finger at in times of crisis.

Like most aspects of smart grid, the issue will likely be determined by those ultimate, omniscient arbiters: the utilities. They will be the ones directly or indirectly footing the bill so the results from their trial and early commercial deployments will be crucial.

My personal view? After a few years of direct competition, the software vendors will find that it’s easier to sell software to demand response companies than utilities, and utilities will enjoy the convenience of having a third party answer those pesky calls about why my TV doesn’t seem as bright as it did after I joined your program. And Steve Chu will pop by to hand out checks to assuage any bruised feelings. Thus, everyone wins.”



This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 8th, 2009 at 2:57 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


About This Blog And Its Authors
Grid Unlocked is powered by two eco-preneurs who analyze and reference articles, reports, and interviews that can help unlock the nascent, complex and expanding linkages between smart meters, smart grids, and above all: smart markets.

Based on decades of experience and interest in conservation, Monty Simus believes that a truly “smart” grid must be a “transactive” grid, unshackled from its current status as a so-called “natural monopoly.”

In short, an unlocked grid must adopt and harness the power of markets to incentivize individual users, linked to each other on a large scale, who change consumptive behavior in creative ways that drive efficiency and bring equity to use of the planet's finite and increasingly scarce resources.